Abstract

BackgroundThere remains a paucity of research comparing the diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes between Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and x-ray modalities for Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy CNO. This retrospective study investigates the use of offloading devices, duration of offloading and final footwear outcomes dependent on imaging at diagnosis. MethodsMedical records from a secondary hospital high-risk foot clinic in Perth, Western Australia, were systematically reviewed. Data collected included baseline medical history, location of CNO, Eichenholtz stage or Chantelau and Grutznel grade at diagnosis, type and duration of offloading, and final footwear outcomes. ResultsTwenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. All had diabetes and peripheral neuropathy. All patients received either an MRI (43%) or x-ray (57%) to confirm the diagnosis of active CNO. Five (17.9%) patients who were diagnosed on MRI had grade 0 CNO whilst 23 (82.1%) patients who were diagnosed on x-ray had stage 1 CNO. No statistical significance was found between the type and duration of offloading, resolution of CNO, footwear and transtibial amputation (TTA) outcomes across those diagnosed with MRI or x-ray. ConclusionNo statistical significance in patient outcomes was found between those diagnosed with grade 0 on MRI and those diagnosed with stage 1 on x-ray.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call