Abstract

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is the most common complication of both type 1 and 2 diabetes. As a result, neuropathic pain, diabetic foot ulcers and lower-limb amputations impact drastically on quality of life, contributing to the individual, societal, financial and healthcare burden of diabetes. DPN is diagnosed at a late, often pre-ulcerative stage due to a lack of early systematic screening and the endorsement of monofilament testing which identifies advanced neuropathy only. Compared to the success of the diabetic eye and kidney screening programmes there is clearly an unmet need for an objective reliable biomarker for the detection of early DPN. This article critically appraises research and clinical methods for the diagnosis or screening of early DPN. In brief, functional measures are subjective and are difficult to implement due to technical complexity. Moreover, skin biopsy is invasive, expensive and lacks diagnostic laboratory capacity. Indeed, point-of-care nerve conduction tests are convenient and easy to implement however questions are raised regarding their suitability for use in screening due to the lack of small nerve fibre evaluation. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, non-invasive, and reproducible technique to quantify small nerve fibre damage and repair which can be conducted alongside retinopathy screening. CCM identifies early sub-clinical DPN, predicts the development and allows staging of DPN severity. Automated quantification of CCM with AI has enabled enhanced unbiased quantification of small nerve fibres and potentially early diagnosis of DPN. Improved screening tools will prevent and reduce the burden of foot ulceration and amputations with the primary aim of reducing the prevalence of this common microvascular complication.

Highlights

  • The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimated the global prevalence of diabetes is 425 million people in 2017 and is predicted to rise to 628 million by 2045 [1].This has been accompanied by an increase in the burden of diabetic complications [2,3].Diabetic neuropathy affects 10–50% of people with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) [4,5,6,7]

  • Diagnostics 2021, 11, 165 tudinal study of 1441 people with T1D in the Diabetes Control and Complications trial (DCCT), intensive insulin treatment reduced the risk of developing Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) by 60% [55,56]

  • Studies published from initial curation of the electronic database to November 2020 were identified and those felt not relevant by authors were excluded with the guidance of the senior author (U.A.)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimated the global prevalence of diabetes is 425 million people in 2017 and is predicted to rise to 628 million by 2045 [1].This has been accompanied by an increase in the burden of diabetic complications [2,3].Diabetic neuropathy affects 10–50% of people with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) [4,5,6,7]. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimated the global prevalence of diabetes is 425 million people in 2017 and is predicted to rise to 628 million by 2045 [1]. This has been accompanied by an increase in the burden of diabetic complications [2,3]. In the US, the annual cost for managing DPN and foot ulceration with lower limb amputation is estimated to be between $4.6–13.7 billion [8]. Small fibre degeneration occurs in prediabetes suggesting early subclinical pathology before the onset of overt T2D [12,13]. Small fibres are the earliest to degenerate and have the greatest potential for repair as shown in studies with normalisation of hyperglycaemia through pancreatic transplantation in T1D and weight loss following lifestyle intervention in prediabetes [14,15,16]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call