Abstract

The Beardmore-Geraldton Belt (BGB) is a major gold camp along the boundary between the granite-greenstone eastern Wabigoon subprovince and the metasedimentary Quetico subprovince of the Archean Superior Province, Canada. New detrital zircon geochronology suggests that the metasedimentary rocks of the BGB and northern Quetico subprovince were derived from the erosion of the eastern Wabigoon subprovince that is dominated by ca. 2900–2680 Ma rocks but also comprises crust as old as > 3200 Ma. Uplift of the eastern Wabigoon subprovince as a result of convergence and compression along its southern margin exposed those rocks to erosion and shed sediments in the Quetico basin to the south. Sedimentation in the Quetico basin is bracketed between ca. 2700 Ma, the age of the youngest detrital zircon population, and 2694.0 ± 1.0 Ma, the crystallization age of cross-cutting feldspar-quartz porphyries (FQP). Continued convergence facilitated the thrust-imbrication of the metavolcanic rocks of the eastern Wabigoon subprovince with the metasedimentary rocks of the Quetico basin resulting in the assembly of the BGB. This resulted in crustal thickening, the introduction of hydrated mafic rocks at the base of the crust, and partial melting of these rocks to form TTG suite melts at depths >50 km, as suggested by the geochemical characteristics of the FQP intrusions. Imbrication and thrusting ended with the emplacement of the stitching, 2690 ± 1 Ma Croll Lake Stock, which has a high transition elements and ferromagnesian oxides signature of sanukitoid suite rocks. It formed during delamination of the lower crust or slab break-off from magmas generated by mixing of hot, mantle material with TTG suite melts at depths > 50 km. The early geological evolution of the Geraldton gold camp is broadly similar to that of other major Archean gold camps associated with major faults and/or terrane boundaries, where deposition of fluvial conglomerate and turbiditic sandstones in fault-bounded basins overlying older volcanic rocks is accompanied by magmatic activity and the upward migration of gold-bearing hydrothermal fluids, while differences between the Geraldton and other camps may be explained by craton-scale variations in geodynamic processes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call