Early Concerning Outcomes for the Edwards Inspiris Resilia Bioprosthesis in the Pulmonary Position

Abstract

BackgroundThe Inspiris Resilia (Edwards Lifesciences LLC) bioprosthesis has gained widespread use in the aortic position; however no robust data are available about its use in the pulmonary position. MethodsWe reviewed our outcomes for the Inspiris Resilia in the pulmonary position between August 2019 and October 2021. ResultsTwenty-seven patients (15 female patients [56%]; mean age, 22.26 ± 14.99 years) were included. The most common original pathology was tetralogy of Fallot (13 patients, 48%). Five patients (18.5%) had prior transcatheter interventions. The mean right ventricular end-diastolic volume index was 164.25 ± 45.1 mL/m2. Sternotomy or repeat sternotomy was the most common approach (21 patients, 77.8%). The standard technique for pulmonary valve replacement was used in 22 patients (81.5%), whereas the prosthesis was implanted as a conduit in the remaining 5 (18.5%). Trivial to mild prosthetic regurgitation was present in 6 patients (22.2%) at the time of discharge. There was no early mortality. Follow-up was complete in all patients (mean, 16 ± 8 months), with no late mortality or late reoperations. New prosthetic regurgitation developed in 13 patients (48%), all of whom underwent replacement with the standard surgical technique. No regurgitation occurred in the conduit cases. This progressed to moderate regurgitation in 6 patients (22%) and severe in 3 (11%). Three patients (11%) underwent transcatheter valve-in-valve after their surgical pulmonary valve replacement. ConclusionsThe early data regarding the Inspiris Resilia bioprosthesis use in the pulmonary position is concerning. The prosthesis design may not be suitable for low-pressure circulation, or modification of its implantation technique may be needed.