Abstract

In daily life, temporal expectations may derive from incidental learning of recurring patterns of intervals. We investigated the incidental acquisition and utilisation of combined temporal-ordinal (spatial/effector) structure in complex visual-motor sequences using a modified version of a serial reaction time (SRT) task. In this task, not only the series of targets/responses, but also the series of intervals between subsequent targets was repeated across multiple presentations of the same sequence. Each participant completed three sessions. In the first session, only the repeating sequence was presented. During the second and third session, occasional probe blocks were presented, where a new (unlearned) spatial-temporal sequence was introduced. We first confirm that participants not only got faster over time, but that they were slower and less accurate during probe blocks, indicating that they incidentally learned the sequence structure. Having established a robust behavioural benefit induced by the repeating spatial-temporal sequence, we next addressed our central hypothesis that implicit temporal orienting (evoked by the learned temporal structure) would have the largest influence on performance for targets following short (as opposed to longer) intervals between temporally structured sequence elements, paralleling classical observations in tasks using explicit temporal cues. We found that indeed, reaction time differences between new and repeated sequences were largest for the short interval, compared to the medium and long intervals, and that this was the case, even when comparing late blocks (where the repeated sequence had been incidentally learned), to early blocks (where this sequence was still unfamiliar). We conclude that incidentally acquired temporal expectations that follow a sequential structure can have a robust facilitatory influence on visually-guided behavioural responses and that, like more explicit forms of temporal orienting, this effect is most pronounced for sequence elements that are expected at short inter-element intervals.

Highlights

  • A lot of our behaviour entails complex patterns that unfold with characteristic temporal profiles

  • To investigate the utilisation of the learned temporal structure in the sequences, we further investigated the difference in probe costs for the different response-to-stimulus intervals (RSIs) that were used in the task (667, 1000 and 1500 ms)

  • We addressed the hypothesis that incidental sequential temporal orienting effects would be largest for targets following short between temporally structured sequence elements, thereby paralleling classical observations in tasks using explicit temporal cues (Correa et al, 2006; Coull and Nobre, 1998; Miniussi et al, 1999; Nobre, 2010; Rohenkohl et al, 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A lot of our behaviour entails complex patterns that unfold with characteristic temporal profiles. Examples of this can be found in speech, playing musical instruments or performing sports. The targets follow a repeating sequence, usually of length 8–12. In such tasks participants generally get faster over the course of the experiment, while it is unknown to them that they learned something.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call