Abstract

BackgroundBioresorbable-polymer drug-eluting stent (BP-DES) demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes compared to durable-polymer drug-eluting stent (DP-DES). However, early- and middle-phase arterial repair following deployment of BP-DES and DP-DES has not been elucidated to date. MethodsWe extracted coronary angioscopy (CAS) findings covering early phase (4 ± 1 months) or middle phase (10 ± 2 months) between January 2010 and February 2018 from the database of Kansai Rosai Hospital. Neointimal coverage (NIC), yellow color intensity of the stented segment and incidence of thrombus adhesion were compared between BP-DES (Synergy or Ultimaster) and DP-DES (Promus or Resolute or Xience) in early (39 BP-DES of 33 lesions from 24 patients and 83 DP-DES of 74 lesions from 56 patients) and middle (198 BP-DES of 175 lesions from 135 patients and 204 DP-DES of 184 lesions from 149 patients) phases. ResultsIn early phase, while NIC was similar in both groups (P = 0.84), the incidence of thrombus adhesion was significantly higher in BP-DES than in DP-DES (67% versus 34%, P = 0.001) even though maximum yellow color was less intense in BP-DES (P = 0.004). In middle phase, while NIC was better in BP-DES (P < 0.001), thrombus adhesion (23% versus 22%, P = 0.81) and maximum yellow color (P = 0.72) were similar in both groups. ConclusionsAlthough NIC was similar in the early phase, the incidence of thrombus adhesion was significantly higher in BP-DES than in DP-DES. The incidence of thrombus adhesion reached similar values and NIC improved in BP-DES over that in DP-DES in the middle phase.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call