Abstract
Recently, the diagnostic criteria of preeclampsia have been changed. No studies are available in the literature that analyzed in detail the differences between early-onset preeclampsia (EOP) and late-onset preeclampsia (LOP), taking into account the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) criteria. Thus, we sought to retrospectively investigate in detail the differences in clinical and laboratory outcomes between EOP and LOP diagnosed according to the ISSHP criteria. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 214 women with singleton pregnancies and preeclampsia admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology of the University Hospital in Kraków, Poland, from 2013 to 2017 (113 (52.8%) women with EOP and 101 (47.2%) women with LOP). Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographics and medical history, laboratory tests, and delivery and neonatal data. Patients with preeclampsia accounted for 1.7% of the women who delivered during the study period. The EOP and LOP groups did not differ in the distribution of risk factors for preeclampsia. The most common risk factor was primiparity, which was observed in 72.0% of cases. Regarding the ISSHP diagnostic criteria, the two groups differed in the incidence of fetal growth restriction (p=0.0009), hemolysis (p=0.0416), and neurological complications (p=00342), which were found more often in the EOP group. In addition, the EOP group had more frequent occurrence of severe cardiorespiratory (p < 0.0001) and hematological (p=0.0127) complications, adverse fetoplacental conditions (p < 0.0001), and severe fetoplacental complications (p=0.0003). Children born to women with EOP had lower Apgar scores (p < 0.001) and higher rates of intraventricular hemorrhage (p < 0.0001), respiratory disorders requiring mechanical ventilation (p < 0.0001), and early (p=0.0004) and late sepsis (p=0.002). EOP differed from LOP in terms of maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. The observed higher rates of fetoplacental adverse conditions and severe complications indicate a significant contribution of impaired placentation to the etiopathogenesis of EOP.
Highlights
Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder specific to pregnancy
There has never been a consensus on the classification and diagnostic criteria for the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. ere are some differences between the two leading institutions dealing with the issue of hypertension in pregnancy, namely, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) [7,8,9], which can lead to differences in their observed rates of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes
We considered the pulsatility index (PI) in the umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) as well as cerebroplacental ratio (CPR MCA PI/UA PI)
Summary
Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder specific to pregnancy. Over the last decades, the incidence of preeclampsia has increased in some regions worldwide [1]. Ere are some differences between the two leading institutions dealing with the issue of hypertension in pregnancy, namely, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) [7,8,9], which can lead to differences in their observed rates of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. In recent years, both ACOG and ISSHP have modified the diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia [7,8,9]. Multiple pregnancies, which occurred at similar frequencies in the two groups (5.8% and 9.0%, respectively), were excluded from further analyses, and 113 women with EOP and 101 women with LOP were enrolled
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
