Abstract

Almost a decade ago, Drs Marshall H. Klaus and John H. Kennell suggested that early and extended contact after birth promoted maternal-infant bonding. A number of investigators have attempted to test such a hypothesis, using short-, intermediate-, and long-range outcome measures. But, controversy regarding the hypothesis persists, based on theoretical and empirical concerns. This review focuses on key methodological issues and presents findings from studies that met specified research design requirements. Although reported results are somewhat inconsistent, there is evidence, particularly among selected subgroups, that early contact is a safe, simple intervention that impacts favorably on maternal-infant behaviors. It is suggested that the term maternal-infant attachment be substituted for bonding, emphasizing a multifactorial, developmental process, rather than an epoxy-like relationship that is fully established in the first hours of life. The favorable impact of early maternal-infant contact is viewed as straightforward and well documented by some investigators, but others are

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.