Abstract

Comparison of the effect of goat anti-rabbit Ig (GARIg) and its monovalent fragment (Fab-GARIg) demonstrates that surface Ig (sIg) crosslinking is not necessary to effect G 0 to G 1 transition in rabbit peripheral blood B cells but is required for induction of DNA synthesis. Five micrograms per milliliter or more of GARIg is sufficient to induce DNA synthesis but up to 50 μg/ml of Fab-GARIg is not. However, the monovalent reagent induces microscopically observable cytoplasmic and nuclear changes (blast transformation) in a dose-dependent manner. These differ qualitatively and quantitatively from the morphological changes seen with comparable doses of GARIg; Fab anti-Ig produces “small blasts” whereas complete GARIg induces large blasts. The monovalent reagent, in a wide range of concentrations, is as effective as the complete antibody in modulating sIg from rabbit B cells. Fab-GARIg treatment modulates sIg in a biphasic manner. It clears the high-density sIg within 5 min, whereas the remaining low-density receptors disappear after 4 hr. Cytosolic protein kinase C levels decline equally after treatment with either Fab-GARIg or whole anti-Ig. RNA synthesis, as measured by [ 3H]uridine incorporation, increases for the first 12 hr in cells activated with either reagent. It declines to basal levels in Fab-GARIg stimulated cells, but a continuous increase occurs in cells stimulated with 5 and 50 μg/ ml of complete antibody. Simultaneous addition of 50 μg/ml Fab-GARIg with 5 μg/ml of GARIg causes greater RNA synthesis for 12 hr after stimulation than is caused by GARIg alone. After 12 hr the monovalent reagent has an inhibitory effect on RNA synthesis. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis of acridine orange-stained cells shows that Fab anti-Ig-stimulated cells have higher RNA content than resting cells, but lower than GARIg-activated cells. These findings suggest that rabbit B cells can be activated from the G 0 stage of cell cycle to G 1 by monovalent anti-Ig reagents but further cell cycle progression requires maintenance signals provided by receptor crosslinking. The implications of these results for B cell activation signalling are discussed in the context of the floating receptor model.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call