Ear differences in evaluating emotional tones of voice and verbal content.

Abstract

Two experiments are presented in which lateralization of monaural, auditory input affected the evaluation of verbal passages. In Experiment 1, subjects listened to taped passages that consisted of three levels (positive, neutral, and negative) of tone of voice crossed with three similar levels of content or meaning, making a total of nine different tone/content combinations. Subjects rated these passages as positive, neutral, or negative, and although they were not instructed about which cues (tone or content) to use, 29 of 36 subjects who listened on the left ear primarily used the tone-of-voice cues to rate the passages, whereas 21 of 36 subjects who listened on the right ear used the content cues (p less than .01). In Experiment 2, subjects were asked to make objective ratings of both tone of voice and content. Subjects who listened on the right ear were more accurate in rating both cues. The lateral differences in evaluating the auditory stimuli are discussed in the framework of the left hemisphere's specialization for analytic processing of objective information and the right hemisphere's specialization for the holistic processing of subjective or emotional information. However, each hemisphere's specialization for tone and content cues can be greatly affected by the demands of the experimental task.