Abstract

We estimated the electrically-evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds (eABR THRs) in response to multi-pulses with high burst rate of 10,000 pulses-per-second (pps). Growth functions of wave eV amplitudes, root mean square (RMS) values, peak of phase-locking value (PLV), and the lowest valid data point (LVDP) were calculated in 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-pulses conditions. The growth functions were then fitted and extrapolated with linear and exponential functions to find eABR THRs. The estimated THRs were compared to psychophysical THRs determined for multi-pulse conditions as well as to the clinical THRs measured behaviorally at the rate of 1,000 pps. The growth functions of features showed shallower growth slopes when the number of pulses increased. eABR THRs estimated in 4-, 8-, and 16-pulses conditions were closer to the clinical THRs, when compared to 1- and 2-pulses conditions. However, the smallest difference between estimated eABR THRs and clinical THRs was not always achieved from the same number of pulses. The smallest absolute difference of 30.3 μA was found for the linear fittings on growth functions of eABR RMS values in 4-pulses condition. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (PCCs) between eABR THRs and psychophysical THRs were significant and relatively large in all but 16-pulses conditions. The PCCs between eABR THRs and clinical THRs, however, were smaller and in less cases significant. Results of this study showed that eABRs to multi-pulse stimulation could, to some extent, represent clinical stimulation paradigms, and thus in comparison to single pulses, could estimate clinical THRs with smaller errors.

Highlights

  • Appropriate adjustment of hearing threshold (THR) levels is important in cochlear implant (CI) fitting in order to make the best use of the limited dynamic range (DR) available in electric hearing

  • The difference between clinical THRs and the psychophysical THRs, and the corresponding absolute values of the differences are plotted in Figures 3B,C, respectively

  • The aim of this study was to examine the capability of the evoked auditory brainstem responses (eABR) THRs in response to MP stimulations to predict clinical THRs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Appropriate adjustment of hearing threshold (THR) levels is important in cochlear implant (CI) fitting in order to make the best use of the limited dynamic range (DR) available in electric hearing. Setting the THRs too low or too high results in suboptimal usage of the available DR In the former case, quiet sounds cannot be perceived and in the latter, the eABR THR Using Multi-Pulse Stimulation available DR is reduced and CI users might even perceive an irritating background noise (Busby and Arora, 2016). The procedure of THR determination becomes hard if the implantee is unable to cooperate, e.g., infants or users with lack of proper communication. In such situations, objective estimation of THRs, where electrically-evoked objective measures of the auditory pathway are used, could be an alternative. A compromise between more peripheral (e.g., eCAP) and more central auditory responses (e.g., CAEP) has to be found

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call