Abstract
The number of mobile applications (“Apps”) has grown significantly in recent years. App Stores rank/recommend Apps based on factors such as average star ratings and the number of installs. Such rankings do not focus on the internal artifacts of Apps (e.g., security vulnerabilities). If internal artifacts are ignored, users may fail to estimate the potential risks associated with installing Apps. In this research, we present a framework called E-SERS (Enhanced Security-related and Evidence-based Ranking Scheme) for comparing Android Apps that offer similar functionalities. E-SERS uses internal and external artifacts of Apps in the ranking process. E-SERS is a significant enhancement of our past evidence-based ranking framework called SERS. We have evaluated E-SERS on publicly accessible Apps from the Google Play Store and compared our rankings with prevalent ranking techniques. Our experiments demonstrate that E-SERS, leveraging its holistic approach, excels in identifying malicious Apps and consistently outperforms existing alternatives in ranking accuracy. By emphasizing comprehensive assessment, E-SERS empowers users, particularly those less experienced with technology, to make informed decisions and avoid potentially harmful Apps. This contribution addresses a critical gap in current App-ranking methodologies, enhancing the safety and security of today’s technologically dependent society.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
