Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to engage in an examination of “Quality in Business Education” (the QUBE project) with a specific brief to examine student involvement in the quality process.Design/methodology/approachThe work was carried out in conjunction with five partner institutions. The semantic distinctions between the terms “customer” and “consumer” subject to a detailed discussion. The paper examines the role of e‐learning in facilitating and encouraging student engagement in course delivery and evaluation.FindingsOne of the classic formulations in which consumers may react to the provision of services is provided by Hirschman's formulation of responses to the provision of services. Put simply, consumers may “vote with their feet” by choosing an alternative supplier of services that fits their need (exit). Another response is to articulate concerns vociferously in order to obtain redress or amelioration (voice). These traditional marketing concepts are then applied to the case of higher education.Originality/valueThe paper suggests an explanation why the student voice does not achieve more prominence, given the possibilities offered by recent advances in ICT, and details some of the experiences of course delivery and evaluation in their own institution.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.