Abstract

Traditional dictionaries offer curated data to users. Users should therefore be able to find the correct data to solve their information need. However, users don't necessarily know the exact scope of lexicographic information. Dictionary articles can still demand considerable interpretation by the user to select the appropriate meaning or equivalent. In the e-environment, users can easily navigate between different e-sources. This is especially evident on various e-book platforms, where one can link multiple dictionaries and other sources to a text or search of the internet. Internet content is obviously not curated, and providing access to such data is therefore anathema to the traditional lexicographer. A traditional dictionary is the result of an application of data pushing procedures. The online environment enables the use of data pulling procedures that give users access to both curated and non-curated data. These issues are illustrated by means of a number of examples that show that a large number of different and disparate information sources are easily available to the user to satisfy any specific information need, and that the dictionary is one of a plethora of information sources. The information is therefore available on demand, without risking information overload. It is argued that, when optimising a network of information tools that constitutes a comprehensive search universe, the information retrieval structure should preferably have a circular network as application domain, rather than a linear continuum.

Highlights

  • Some dictionaries, especially printed dictionaries, can still be regarded as stand-alone reference products

  • Successful utilisation of possibilities available in the online environment demanded an increase in interdisciplinary collaboration. In this regard the importance of mutual research efforts in the fields of lexicography and information science has been apparent for some time, as is evident from a number of articles in Fuertes-Olivera and Bergenholtz (2011) and Granger and Paquot (2012)

  • This paper looks at some of the issues relevant to lexicography when negotiating the position of smart e-dictionaries in a network of information tools

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Especially printed dictionaries, can still be regarded as stand-alone reference products. Successful utilisation of possibilities available in the online environment demanded an increase in interdisciplinary collaboration In this regard the importance of mutual research efforts in the fields of lexicography and information science has been apparent for some time, as is evident from a number of articles in Fuertes-Olivera and Bergenholtz (2011) and Granger and Paquot (2012). One of the realities of online referencing is that dictionaries function along with numerous other reference sources in a network of information tools This has been stated succinctly by Varantola already in 2002: Dictionaries need not be regarded as stand-alone lexical tools that should provide all the answers that the users need about language in use. This paper looks at some of the issues relevant to lexicography when negotiating the position of smart e-dictionaries in a network of information tools

Finding the desired item
Moving between different information tools
Data pushing and pulling
Reaching data
Making choices
Digital natives
Data distribution structures and data identification in a search universe
Satisfying information needs
In conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call