Abstract

The tenability of cognitive explanations of the experience of fear during panic attacks (viz. Ley's misattribution-of-symptoms hypothesis and Beck's and Clark's catastrophic-misinterpretation-of-symptoms hypotheses) is seriously questioned by findings from three independent lines of research: (a) Wolpe and Rowan's observation that catastrophic cognitions follow fear, (b) Rachman, Levitt and Lopatka's reports of panic attacks without fearful cognitions, and (c) reports of panic attacks during sleep occurring predominately during non-dreaming stages of sleep. Recognition of these findings led Ley to reject his misattribution-of-symptoms hypothesis in favor of an innate emotional-respiratory-response explanation. The revised hyperventilation theory now maintains that fear experienced during a hyperventilatory panic attack is caused by severe dyspnea in the context of little or no perceived control over the causes of the dyspnea (i.e. dyspneic-fear). Cognitions during panic attacks are discussed in terms of the cognitive deficit that results from the cerebral hypoxia produced by hyperventilation. Implications for theory and treatment are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.