Dyngo-4a Induces Neuroblastoma Cell Differentiation Through The AKT and ERK1/2 Pathway.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to check whether dyngo-4a can inhibit neuroblastoma (NB) proliferation and induce NB cell differentiation Background: Dynamin plays a role in regulating neurotransmission, signaling pathways, nutrient uptake, and pathogen infection, enhancing cell proliferation, tumor invasion, and metastasis. Studies have reported that dyngo-4a, a dynamin inhibitor, can be used to identify potential biomarkers and promising novel therapeutic targets for cancer treatment. To our knowledge, no published reports are showing that dynamin inhibitors can reduce NB cell proliferation and induce differentiation. In this study, we report that dyngo-4a can inhibit NB proliferation and induce NB cell differentiation. In this study, mouse neuroblastoma (Neuro-2a) cells were cultured in the presence or absence of dyngo-4a or retinoic acid (RA), or in the presence of both dyngo-4a and RA, or in the presence of sequential administration of dyngo-4a and RA to compare the effects on the inhibition of cell proliferation and effects on neuroblastoma cell differentiation induction. The neural cell markers, Nestin and Tuj 1 (Neuron-specific class III beta-tubulin), were used to demonstrate that the differentiated cells have neuronal cell features. The phosphorylation of Protein Kinase B (AKT), extracellular signalregulated kinases1/2 (ERK1/2), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were determined to examine the potential mechanisms of induced differentiation. Dyngo-4a or RA or dyngo-4a with subsequent RA administration induced Neuro-2a cell differentiation. However, RA with subsequent dyngo-4a administration results in almost total death of the Neuro-2a cells. The differentiation rate induced by dyngo-4a was significantly higher than the rate by RA treatment (72.5 ± 1.4% vs. 52.9 ± 3.1% with neuron features, P<0.05; 39.0 ± 0.8% vs. 29.9 ± 1.8% for axons under light microscopy, p<0.05). The differentiation rate of cells treated with dyngo-4a first, followed by RA, was greater than when they were added together (74.8 ± 3.8% vs. 10.6 ± 3.6%; 45.5 ± 1.6% vs. 12.4 ± 0.6%, p<0.01). Co-administration of dyngo-4a and RA at the same time diminished differentiation efficacy significantly. Dyngo-4a induced Neuro-2a cell differentiation and increased Tuj-1 positive staining by the 6th day post- treatment. Dyngo-4a also inhibited Neuro-2a cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Regarding the mechanism, dyngo-4a treatment showed a significant increase in p-AKT and p-ERK1/2 but not in p-EGFR. At a level comparable to RA, dynamin inhibition with dyngo-4a lowers proliferation and causes differentiation of Neuro-2a mouse NB cells in vitro. The AKT pathway is activated by dynago- 4a, which results in differentiation. The combination of RA with dynago-4a reduces the efficiency of differentiation. The application of dynago-4a followed by RA, on the other hand, enhances the differentiating effect, implying alternative mechanistic roles in the process.