Abstract
The evolution of a thin liquid film subject to a volatile solvent source and an air-blow effect which modifies locally the surface tension and leads to Marangoni-induced flow is shown to be governed by a degenerate fourth order nonlinear parabolic h-evolution equation of the type given by ∂ t h = − div x M 1 h ∂ x 3 h + M 2 h ∂ x h + M 3 h , where the mobility terms M 1 h and M 2 h result from the presence of the source and M 3 h results from the air-blow effect. Various authors assume M 2 h ≈ 0 and exclude the air-blow effect into M 3 h . In this paper, the authors show that such assumption is not necessarily correct, and the inclusion of such effect does disturb the dynamics of the thin film. These emphasize the importance of the full definition t → · grad γ = grad x γ + ∂ x h grad y γ of the surface tension gradient at the free surface in contrast to the truncated expression t → · grad γ ≈ grad x γ employed by those authors and the effect of the air-blow flowing over the surface.
Highlights
We study the influence of a volatile solvent on the evolution of a thin liquid film on a solid surface
As the volatile solvent diffuses through the atmosphere, a non-uniform solvent concentration arises which induces surface tension gradient and Marangoni-driven flow [1,2,3]
Following the works of Carles et al, we describe the presence of a volatile solvent in the atmosphere, region Ωv ⊂ R2, by a volatile source function S (~x ) of the form μ s Ms exp
Summary
We study the influence of a volatile solvent on the evolution of a thin liquid film on a solid surface. As the volatile solvent diffuses through the atmosphere, a non-uniform solvent concentration arises which induces surface tension gradient and Marangoni-driven flow [1,2,3] This effect is well-known and was described in the pioneering works of Marangoni [4] and Thomson [5]. One aim of this paper is to explore the effect of these terms which have typically been disregarded by others Another important aspect in the study of Marangoni drying is the two way-coupling between the liquid film and the surrounding atmosphere. The authors generalize the one-sided study of Burelbach et al [15] on the evaporation of thin film by including the diffusion of the vapor phase region Their results are described in terms of both interfacial and mass transport phenomena. The results are discussed through a series of case studies under Section 3 and concluded on this basis under
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.