Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of using dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control on the dynamics of the accommodative response and facility. Methods24 young adult myopes were fitted with dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control (MiSight®) and single-vision soft contact lenses (Proclear®). The WAM-5500 open-field autorefractor was used to measure the dynamics of the accommodative response (magnitude and variability) in binocular conditions, with accommodative data being gathered from the dominant eye, at three viewing distances (500 cm, 40 cm, and 20 cm) during 90 s. Also, the binocular accommodative facility was assessed with the WAM-5500 autorefractor. All participants performed the same experimental protocol with the dual-focus (MiSight) and single-vision (Proclear) soft contact lenses, with both experimental sessions being carried in two different days and following a counterbalanced order. ResultsThis study showed greater lags of accommodation with the MiSight than the Proclear lenses at near distances (40 cm: 1.27 ± 0.77 vs. 0.68 ± 0.37 D, corrected p-value = 0.002, Cohen-d = 0.90; and 20 cm: 1.47 ± 0.84 vs. 1.01 ± 0.52 D, corrected p-value = 0.007, Cohen-d = 0.75), whereas a higher variability of accommodation was observed with the dual-focus than the single-vision lenses at 500 cm (0.53 ± 0.11 vs. 0.23 ± 0.10 D), 40 cm (0.82 ± 0.31 vs. 0.68 ± 0.37 D), and 20 cm (1.50 ± 0.56 vs. 1.15 ± 0.39 D) (corrected p-value < 0.001 in all cases, and Cohen-ds = 0.67–2.33). Also, a worse quantitative (27.75 ± 8.79 vs. 34.29 ± 10.08 cycles per minute, p = 0.029, Cohen-d = 0.48) and qualitative (23.68 ± 7.12 vs. 28.43 ± 7.97 score, p = 0.039, Cohen-d = 0.45) performance was observed with the MiSight when compared to the Proclear lenses. ConclusionsThe use of dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control alters the dynamics of accommodative response and facility in the short-term. Although this optical design has demonstrated its effectiveness for myopia control, eye care specialists should be aware of the acute effects of these lenses on accommodation performance.

Highlights

  • Myopia is a public health issue and its prevalence has been increasing over the years

  • Post hoc analysis between the three target distances demonstrated a lower stability of the accommodative response at 20 cm than 40 cm and 500 cm, as well as at 40 cm when compared to 500 cm

  • Data from this study show that wearing dual-focus soft contact lenses significantly alters the dynamics of the accommodative response and facility in young myopes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Myopia is a public health issue and its prevalence has been increasing over the years. Myopia can lead to pathological complications (e.g., choroidal neovascularization, myopic macular degeneration, etc.) and impairs vision-related quality of life [2,3]. Due to the negative public health and economic impact of myopia, there are considerable research efforts to determine the most effective intervention to slow myopia progression [10,11,12]. The use of multifocal soft-contact lenses to reduce or eliminate peripherical hyperopic defocus has gained in popularity in the last years due to its effectiveness to decelerate eye axial elongation [16,18,19,20]. Regardless of the optical design, the contact lenses should provide an acceptable visual (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call