Abstract

The paper is devoted to the experimental and CFD investigation of a plasma formation impact on the supersonic flow over a body “blunt cone-cylinder”. In the experiments, a series of schlieren pictures of bow shock wave–blast waves non-stationary interaction was obtained with the use of high speed shadowgraphy. The accompanying calculations are based on the system of Euler equations. The freestream Mach number is 3.1. The plasmoid is modeled by the instantaneous release of energy into a bounded volume of gas, increasing the pressure in the volume. The research of the dynamics of a shock wave structure caused by the bow shock wave and blast flow interaction has been conducted. The significant value of energy released to a supersonic flow (500J) allowed constructing a diagram of the generation and dynamics of the resulting shock waves and contact discontinuities, as well as obtaining a significant drop in the drag force and stagnation pressure (up to 80%). The dynamics of a low density and high gas temperature zone, which becomes the main factor reducing the frontal body drag force, was researched. The dynamics of the front surface drag forces have been studied for different values of the plasmoid energy as well. Qualitative agreement of the numerical flow patterns with the experiment ones has been obtained.

Highlights

  • Control of supersonic flows by means of plasma formations generated by electrical discharges, microwave energy release, and laser pulses is currently an extensive field of aerospace engineering studies

  • The effect of the external energy source produced by microwave discharge was shown to result in decreasing stagnation pressure together with the reduction in the drag force of a blunt cylinder [13]

  • The gas in the energy source moves from its center to the periphery and moves towards the bow shock as well

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Control of supersonic flows by means of plasma formations generated by electrical discharges, microwave energy release, and laser pulses is currently an extensive field of aerospace engineering studies (see [1] and surveys in [2,3,4,5,6]). Several shock waves are visualized (Figures 2d and 3c), which interact with each other (Figure 3e,f), and they form a new bow shock when the flow becomes steady again sometime after the end of the impact of the energy deposition area (Figure 3g).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call