Abstract

The fact that L2 willingness to communicate (WTC) can fluctuate over different time scales is no longer disputed as numerous studies have proved a dynamic rather than trait-like character of the concept (cf. MacIntyre & Legatto, 2011; MacIntyre, Burns, & Jessome, 2011; Mystkowska-Wiertelak & Pawlak, 2014). The changes in the intensity of L2 learners’ readiness to engage in communication in the classroom context have been investigated in a number of studies attempting also to establish factors capable of stimulating or hindering WTC (e.g., Cao & Philip, 2006; Pawlak & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, 2015; Peng, 2014). Many of empirical explorations of L2 learners’ WTC, although representing the ecological perspective, provide solely a snapshot of classroom reality, thus generating a question if such one-at-a-time picture frame can sufficiently accommodate diverse factors that impinge on learners’ readiness to engage in communication. The application of a longitudinal design was thus dictated by the author’s intention to gather information on WTC ebbs and flows not only during single lessons but also continuing over a number of lessons conducted throughout a semester of study, which allowed for exploring a wider spectrum of conditions that affect WTC of advanced learners of English attending speaking classes. Detailed lesson plans, interview and questionnaire data were used to interpret WTC fluctuations reported by the participants at 5-min intervals in the course of 7 lessons. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the data revealed that the intensity of communicative behaviour depends on an intricate interplay of personal and group-related factors, with a special role ascribed to the instructor whose knowledge of the group characteristics and needs coupled with didactic skills can greatly contribute to increasing WTC in the classroom.

Highlights

  • The study of willingness to communicate (WTC), which emerged from exploring, first, mother tongue (L1) and second/foreign (L2) learners/users’ reticence or reluctance to communicate, has been attracting the attention of researchers for a few decades

  • Investigations into the dynamic character of WTC have differed considerably in focus and scope involving laboratory-style investigations, the prime examples being the application of the idiodynamic method by MacIntyre and Legatto (2011) or classroom-based studies like those conducted by Peng (2014), Pawlak and Mystkowska-Wiertelak (2015) or Pawlak, MystkowskaWiertelak, and Bielak (2016)

  • The analysis of the data collected by means of research instruments described above provided evidence for the dynamic character of L2 learners’ WTC during single lessons as well as in the course of a semester of study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of willingness to communicate (WTC), which emerged from exploring, first, mother tongue (L1) and second/foreign (L2) learners/users’ reticence or reluctance to communicate, has been attracting the attention of researchers for a few decades now. The early conceptualization of L2 WTC as a learner’s stable characteristic or as a predisposition to initiate or avoid communication with others when given a choice (McCroskey, 1992) has been overruled following the advances made by MacIntyre, Clément, Dörnyei, and Noels (1998), who presented L2 WTC as an outcome of a joint operation of a number of distal and proximal antecedents comprising both individual tendencies as well as intergroup relations This shift of focus to the contextual nature of WTC resulted in a whole host of studies aimed at disclosing situated, personal, and context-related variables shaping L2 WTC in the classroom setting (cf Cao, 2011, 2013; Cao & Philip, 2006; Kang, 2005; Mystkowska-Wiertelak & Pawlak, 2014; Weaver, 2007). This is followed by the description of the current study, the presentation and discussion of its findings and, some pedagogical recommendations as well as suggestions for future research

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call