Abstract

BackgroundThe dynamic motions of many proteins are central to their function. It therefore follows that the dynamic requirements of a protein are evolutionary constrained. In order to assess and quantify this, one needs to compare the dynamic motions of different proteins. Comparing the dynamics of distinct proteins may also provide insight into how protein motions are modified by variations in sequence and, consequently, by structure. The optimal way of comparing complex molecular motions is, however, far from trivial. The majority of comparative molecular dynamics studies performed to date relied upon prior sequence or structural alignment to define which residues were equivalent in 3-dimensional space.ResultsHere we discuss an alternative methodology for comparative molecular dynamics that does not require any prior alignment information. We show it is possible to align proteins based solely on their dynamics and that we can use these dynamics-based alignments to quantify the dynamic similarity of proteins. Our method was tested on 10 representative members of the PDZ domain family.ConclusionsAs a result of creating pair-wise dynamics-based alignments of PDZ domains, we have found evolutionarily conserved patterns in their backbone dynamics. The dynamic similarity of PDZ domains is highly correlated with their structural similarity as calculated with Dali. However, significant differences in their dynamics can be detected indicating that sequence has a more refined role to play in protein dynamics than just dictating the overall fold. We suggest that the method should be generally applicable.

Highlights

  • The dynamic motions of many proteins are central to their function

  • To a distance matrix that characterizes a single conformation, a dynamic fingerprint matrix characterizes an ensemble of conformations. (The relationship of Dynamic Fingerprint Matrix (DFM) and correlation matrices is discussed in Additional file 1.)

  • We have demonstrated a novel methodology for comparing the backbone dynamics of proteins simulated by

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The dynamic motions of many proteins are central to their function. It follows that the dynamic requirements of a protein are evolutionary constrained. Several studies have managed to relate internal protein motions to biochemical functions [5,6], and in particular the characterization and prediction of large-scale conformational changes via the use of normal modes [7] and elastic-network models [8,9] has been quite successful. There are many signalling molecules (for example PDZ domains) where there is not a large-scale conformational change and yet somehow the information that a ligand has bound is communicated to a different region of the protein. It is not clear if slight variations in structure can lead to large variations in dynamics, or similar protein structures always have similar motions [9]. These problems require a more detailed picture of the underlying dynamics

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.