Abstract

Context. Evolutionary models are widely used to infer the mass of stars, brown dwarfs, and giant planets. Their predictions are thought to be less reliable at young ages (< 200 Myr) and in the low-mass regime (< 1 M⊙). GJ 2060 AB and TWA 22 AB are two rare astrometric M-dwarf binaries, respectively members of the AB Doradus (AB Dor) and Beta Pictoris (β Pic) moving groups. As their dynamical mass can be measured to within a few years, they can be used to calibrate the evolutionary tracks and set new constraints on the age of young moving groups. Aims. We provide the first dynamical mass measurement of GJ 2060 and a refined measurement of the total mass of TWA 22. We also characterize the atmospheric properties of the individual components of GJ 2060 that can be used as inputs to the evolutionary models. Methods. We used NaCo and SPHERE observations at VLT and archival Keck/NIRC2 data to complement the astrometric monitoring of the binaries. We combined the astrometry with new HARPS radial velocities (RVs) and FEROS RVs of GJ 2060. We used a Markov chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) module to estimate posteriors on the orbital parameters and dynamical masses of GJ 2060 AB and TWA 22 AB from the astrometry and RVs. Complementary data obtained with the integral field spectrograph VLT/SINFONI were gathered to extract the individual near-infrared (1.1–2.5 μm) medium-resolution (R ∼ 1500 − 2000) spectra of GJ 2060 A and B. We compared the spectra to those of known objects and to grids of BT-SETTL model spectra to infer the spectral type, bolometric luminosities, and temperatures of those objects. Results. We find a total mass of 0.18 ± 0.02 M⊙ for TWA 22, which is in good agreement with model predictions at the age of the β Pic moving group. We obtain a total mass of 1.09 ± 0.10 M⊙ for GJ 2060. We estimate a spectral type of M1 ± 0.5, L/L⊙ = −1.20 ± 0.05 dex, and Teff = 3700 ± 100 K for GJ 2060 A. The B component is a M3 ± 0.5 dwarf with L/L⊙ = −1.63 ± 0.05 dex and Teff = 3400 ± 100 K. The dynamical mass of GJ 2060 AB is inconsistent with the most recent models predictions (BCAH15, PARSEC) for an AB Dor age in the range 50–150 Myr. It is 10%–20% (1–2σ, depending on the assumed age) above the model’s predictions, corresponding to an underestimation of 0.10–0.20 M⊙. Coevality suggests a young age for the system (∼50 Myr) according to most evolutionary models. Conclusions. TWA 22 validates the predictions of recent evolutionary tracks at ∼20 Myr. On the other hand, we evidence a 1–2σ mismatch between the predicted and observed mass of GJ 2060 AB. This slight departure may indicate that one of the stars hosts a tight companion. Alternatively, this would confirm the model’s tendency to underestimate the mass of young low-mass stars.

Highlights

  • Our understanding of stellar evolution has made a lot of progress since the introduction of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD) a hundred years ago

  • This paper presents an in-depth study of these two systems using published and additional observations, and discusses the agreement between their orbits, their atmospheric properties, the ages of their moving groups, and the pre-main sequence (PMS) evolutionary models

  • We checked the consistency between the fitted orbit and the SPHERE point that we did not consider: the astrometry falls within the 68% confidence interval of the orbital fit, between

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Our understanding of stellar evolution has made a lot of progress since the introduction of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD) a hundred years ago. The beginning of a star life, before it reaches the zero age main sequence, has been in particular deeply investigated through the development of evolutionary models. The latter rely on equations of state describing the stellar interior structure, and can make use of atmospheric models to define boundary conditions and predict emergent spectra. Different families of models exist (D’Antona & Mazzitelli 1997; Siess et al 2000; Tognelli et al 2012; Bressan et al 2012; Feiden 2015; Baraffe et al 2015), and their physical and chemical ingredients (e.g., nuclear rates, opacity, atmospheric parameters) have been updated in the recent years (e.g., Baraffe et al 2015). The mass is the fundamental parameter which allows to comprehend the object nature and formation pathways

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.