Abstract

We derive the stellar-to-halo mass relation (SHMR), namely f⋆ ∝ M⋆/Mh versus M⋆ and Mh, for early-type galaxies from their near-infrared luminosities (for M⋆) and the position-velocity distributions of their globular cluster systems (for Mh). Our individual estimates of Mh are based on fitting a flexible dynamical model with a distribution function expressed in terms of action-angle variables and imposing a prior on Mh from the correlation between halo concentration and mass in the standard Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmology. We find that the SHMR for early-type galaxies declines with mass beyond a peak at M⋆ ∼ 5 × 1010 M⊙ and Mh ∼ 1 × 1012 M⊙ (near the mass of the Milky Way). This result is consistent with the standard SHMR derived by abundance matching for the general population of galaxies, and also with previous, less robust derivations of the SHMR for early-type galaxies. However, it contrasts sharply with the monotonically rising SHMR for late-type galaxies derived from extended HI rotation curves and the same ΛCDM prior on Mh that we adopt for early-type galaxies. We show that the SHMR for massive galaxies varies more or less continuously with disc fraction and Hubble type between these rising and falling branches. We also show that the different SHMRs for late-type and early-type galaxies are consistent with the similar scaling relations between their stellar velocities and masses (the Tully–Fisher and the Faber–Jackson relations). As we demonstrate explicitly, differences in the relations between the stellar and halo virial velocities account for the similarity of the scaling relations. We argue that all these empirical findings are natural consequences of a picture in which galactic discs are built mainly by relatively smooth and gradual inflow, regulated by feedback from young stars, while galactic spheroids are built by a combination of merging, black-hole fuelling, and feedback from active galactic nuclei.

Highlights

  • Galaxies consist of stars and interstellar gas in relatively compact bodies surrounded by more extended halos of dark matter and circumgalactic gas

  • While f increases with M for late types (PFM19), it decreases for early types, in broad agreement with expectations from abundance matching (e.g. Moster et al 2013)

  • Our results show unequivocally that the stellar-tohalo mass relation (SHMR) has a secondary correlation with galaxy type at the high-mass end. (ii) For massive galaxies (M > 5 × 1010 M ), we studied how f deviates from the expectations of abundance matching ( f, AM) as a function of disc fraction and Hubble type

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Galaxies consist of stars and interstellar gas in relatively compact bodies surrounded by more extended halos of dark matter and circumgalactic gas. Since the SHMR depends on Mh, it is possible that the similar velocity scaling relations are explained by, and disguised by, different underlying relations between the stellar velocities of early-type and late-type galaxies and one or more properties of their dark matter halos, offering potentially important clues about the physical mechanisms responsible for different galactic morphologies We explore this issue here for the first time. 5, we reconcile the different shapes of the SHMRs for latetype and early-type galaxies with their similar velocity scaling relations in terms of differences between their stellar and halo velocities, and we interpret this result as a natural consequence of the different roles of smooth inflow, merging, and AGN feedback in the formation of galactic discs and spheroids. We distinguish between late-type and early-type galaxies based on published morphological classifications; early types are E and S0 (Hubble type T < 0), while late types are S0/a, Sa, Sb, Sc, and Irr (Hubble type T ≥ 0)

Early types
Late types
Dependence on stellar and halo masses
Dependence on disc fraction and morphological type
Comparison with other estimates of the SHMR
Statistical estimates of the SHMR
The mass of the GC system as a dark matter halo tracer
The SHMR and galaxy scaling laws
A paradox and its resolution
Physical interpretation
Summary and conclusions
Preliminaries
Distribution function
Parameter estimation
Findings
Derived quantities
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call