Abstract
Stimulating competition is one of the main topics in most health care reform debates, and it has been a central issue in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), USA, since 2009. The goal of this paper is to use complex network methods to study dynamic and structure of competition under ACA and its evolution over time since its beginning until 2017. Using publicly available data, we construct a bipartite network of counties and insurance providers, create associated weighted single-mode networks, and analyze the evolution of network parameters that are related to competition and potential collusion in complex networks. These parameters have been previously tied to the dynamics of collaboration and competition in earlier theoretical works. We argue that three parameters ( network modularity , and the mean and skewness of eigenvector centrality ) are appropriate indicators of the overall competition in the insurance market. Based on these parameters, we show that the level of systemic competition among insurers as a function of time is an inverse U-shape trend, and that competition has returned back to what it was at the very beginning of ACA, indicating an undesirable resilience in the national health care system.
Highlights
Spurring more competition among health insurance companies has been one of the central goals in most proposals and plans offered over the past decades for revamping the US health care system
Level in 2013, once the network measures are calculated for weighted networks. This is interesting as it suggests an inherent and undesirable resilience in the insurance market that has brought back the network to its original state, three years after the external shock that was introduced by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to the system
We took a deeper look into the structure and dynamic of competition in the insurance market, by analyzing the data from the start of the ACA until the latest available data in April 2017
Summary
Spurring more competition among health insurance companies has been one of the central goals in most proposals and plans offered over the past decades for revamping the US health care system. For each set of data, released on healthcare.gov [5] from 2013 until April 2017, we construct a bipartite network of counties and insurance providers, create associated weighted mono-partite networks, and analyze the evolution of network parameters that are related to competition and potential collusion in complex networks. These parameters have been previously tied to the dynamics of collaboration and competition in earlier theoretical works.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.