Abstract
Hill (2008) and Hill (2010) contain two technical errors: (1) a missing factor of 2 for computed Love‐wave amplitudes, and (2) a sign error in the off‐diagonal elements in the Euler rotation matrix. Correction 1 : The equations for Love‐wave stresses (equation 21 in Hill, 2008, and equation A8 in Hill, 2010), are correct. A factor of 2 in these equations, however, was inadvertently omitted in the computational code. Accordingly, the corrected Love‐wave stress amplitudes are double those published in Hill (2008) and Hill (2010). Correction 2 : The Euler rotation matrix B that was used in Hill (2008) and Hill …
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
