Abstract
Species distribution models (SDMs) relate species information to environmental conditions to predict potential species distributions. The majority of SDMs are static, relating species presence information to long-term average environmental conditions. The resulting temporal mismatch between species information and environmental conditions can increase model inference’s uncertainty. For SDMs to capture the dynamic species-environment relationships and predict near-real-time habitat suitability, species information needs to be spatiotemporally matched with environmental conditions contemporaneous to the species’ presence (dynamic SDMs). Implementing dynamic SDMs in the marine realm is highly challenging, particularly due to species and environmental data paucity and spatiotemporally biases. Here, we implemented presence-only dynamic SDMs for four migratory baleen whale species in the Southern Ocean (SO): Antarctic minke, Antarctic blue, fin, and humpback whales. Sightings were spatiotemporally matched with their respective daily environmental predictors. Background information was sampled daily to describe the dynamic environmental conditions in the highly dynamic SO. We corrected for spatial sampling bias by sampling background information respective to the seasonal research efforts. Independent model evaluation was performed on spatial and temporal cross-validation. We predicted the circumantarctic year-round habitat suitability of each species. Daily predictions were also summarized into bi-weekly and monthly habitat suitability. We identified important predictors and species suitability responses to environmental changes. Our results support the propitious use of dynamic SDMs to fill species information gaps and improve conservation planning strategies. Near-real-time predictions can be used for dynamic ocean management, e.g., to examine the overlap between habitat suitability and human activities. Nevertheless, the inevitable spatiotemporal biases in sighting data from the SO call for the need for improving sampling effort in the SO and using alternative data sources (e.g., passive acoustic monitoring) in future SDMs. We further discuss challenges of calibrating dynamic SDMs on baleen whale species in the SO, with a particular focus on spatiotemporal sampling bias issues and how background information should be sampled in presence-only dynamic SDMs. We also highlight the need to integrate visual and acoustic data in future SDMs on baleen whales for better coverage of environmental conditions suitable for the species and avoid constraints of using either data type alone.
Highlights
Spatiotemporal information on marine species distributions is essential for strategic conservation planning and dynamic management (Guisan et al, 2013; Hazen et al, 2017)
We showed how habitat suitability depends on each predictor using marginal response curves and response curves of additional models calibrated using only one predictor in turn
As marginal response curves can be sensitive to the value at which other predictors were fixed, we showed predicted habitat suitability in the pairwise environmental space of the four most important predictors
Summary
Spatiotemporal information on marine species distributions is essential for strategic conservation planning and dynamic management (Guisan et al, 2013; Hazen et al, 2017). The availability of high-quality, unbiased data at appropriate spatial and temporal resolution is challenging in many situations, especially over large spatial scales and in remote regions (Rondinini et al, 2006; Hortal et al, 2015; Menegotto and Rangel, 2018). This is evident for whales due to their imperfect detectability and the high logistic, environmental, and financial constraints (Kaschner et al, 2006; Bamford et al, 2020). Static SDM applications were shown as effective tools for conservation planning in many terrestrial settings (Guisan et al, 2013), they can neither capture the dynamics of the environment and species distribution nor predict near-real-time species distribution. In highly dynamic marine environments, polar areas characterized by the seasonal presence of sea ice, static models can only provide a virtual representation (in time) of species suitability for the period over which the model is calibrated
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.