Dynamic response of RC beam-slab substructures following instantaneous removal of columns

Abstract

High fidelity solid-element-based numerical modeling is employed in this paper to study the dynamic response of reinforced concrete (RC) beam-slab substructures following instantaneous removal of columns. After validation of the numerical model against experimental results, incremental dynamic analysis is conducted to obtain the dynamic structural resistance to progressive collapse. The numerical results for development of internal forces and distribution of stress and strain are used to illustrate the load redistribution and load transfer mechanisms of RC beam-slab substructures subjected to sudden loss of columns. The numerical model is further employed to explore parameters affecting the dynamic response and structural resistance of beam-slab substructures under sudden column removal scenario. The parameters studied include damping ratio, slab thickness, location of removed columns, multi-column removal sequence and interval. The numerical result shows that the dynamic progressive collapse resistance of the beam-slab substructure is much smaller than the quasi-static test result due to a dynamic increase factor (DIF) of 1.14. Moreover, a minimum slab thickness of 1/45 of span length is found vital for the improvement of progressive collapse resistance of RC beam-slab substructures through developing compressive membrane action (CMA) and tensile membrane action (TMA) as well as enhancing the development of compressive arch action (CAA) and tensile centenary action (TCA) of beams. When the damping ratio is smaller than 5%, the increase of damping ratio can significantly benefit the structural resistance against progressive collapse by producing smaller deflection and milder vibration. The additional loss of the corner column besides the penultimate perimeter column is found to form the most hazardous situation among the double-column removal scenarios. In contrast to the location of removed columns, the column removal sequence and interval tend to little affect the maximum deflection developed and consequently the progressive collapse resistance of substructures.