Dynamic Response Differences Between Bedding and Counter-Tilt Rock Slopes with Intercalated Weak Layers

Abstract

Bedding and counter-tilt rock slope with intercalated weak layers are common geological bodies in west China, the dynamic response research will guide the anti-seismic reinforcement of bedding and counter-tilt rock slope with intercalated weak layer effectively. Two test models of bedding rock slope with intercalated weak layer and counter-tilt rock slope with intercalated weak layer, which are in the same size, have been designed and developed. A large scale shaking table test has been performed to analyze the dynamic response difference of bedding and counter-tilt rock slope with intercalated weak layer. The study results show that the acceleration amplification coefficient inside the bedding slope is smaller than that inside the counter-tilt rock slope; at the middle and upper parts of the slope body (relative height > 0.4), the acceleration amplification coefficient at bedding rock slope surface is larger than that of counter-tilt rock slope. At the lower part of the slope (relative height le 0.4), the acceleration amplification coefficient at bedding rock slope surface is close to that of counter-tilt rock slope. The slope surface displacement of both bedding and counter-tilt rock slopes increases with increasing input seismic wave amplitude. The slope surface displacement of the bedding rock is larger than that of counter-tilt rock slope. The seismic stability of counter-tilt rock slope is stronger than bedding rock slope. The dynamic failure form of bedding rock slope mainly includes vertical tension crack at back edge, bedding sliding along intercalated weak layer and rock collapse at slope crest; whereas the dynamic failure form of counter-tilt slope mainly includes intersection of horizontal and vertical cracks on slope surface, extrusion of intercalated weak layer and shattering of slope crest.