Abstract

Abstract Multicomponent, time-lapse seismology has great potential for monitoring production processes in reservoirs. The main reason is simply the presence of fluid-filled fractures. Shear waves (s-waves) are much more sensitive than compressional waves (p-waves) to the presence of fractures or microfractures and the fluid content within the fracture network. Fractures introduce seismic anisotropy into a reservoir, causing two shear modes (S1 and S2) to propagate with different velocities and therefore different arrival times. This phenomenon is referred to as s-wave splitting or birefringence, and is critical for estimating fracture density (see Martin and Davis, 1987). At Central Vacuum Unit (CVU), s-wave splitting is developing as an important key to monitoring production processes associated with carbon dioxide (CO2) flooding. Fluid property changes associated with CO2 flooding produce changes in the velocities of the split s-waves passing through the reservoir interval. Fluid properties change in response to CO2 and oil becoming a miscible phase in the presence of in-situ fluids. S-wave splitting can also be used to identify areas of anomalous reservoir pressure. S-wave splitting and velocities are extremely sensitive to the local stress field because all rocks, especially carbonates, contain incipient networks of microfractures at a state of near-criticality (Zatsepin and Crampin, 1997). S-wave splitting can assist in separating effective stress changes associated with abnormal fluid pressures from fluid property change. This conclusion is inferred by results of the CVU study. During the first phase, Phase-I of this study, a prominent s-wave splitting anomaly was detected to the south of a cyclic CO2 injection well (CVU 97). It is believed that this anomaly corresponded to the tertiary flood bank that developed south of this temporary injection well (Figure 1a). Noticeable in the periphery to this anomaly are anisotropy anomalies of opposite sign related to offset wells that were used to contain the CO2 bank through water injection. The sign change of s-wave anisotropy occurs because the relative velocities of the split s-waves reverse. In the case of the miscible CO2-oil bank, the S2 velocity increased and S1 decreased, whereas, in the case of water injection, the effective stress causes S2 to decrease and S1 to increase. Similar effects were observed during the second phase, Phase-II of the monitoring study (Figure 1b). These results imply that s-wave anisotropy can be used to monitor secondary (water flooding) as well as tertiary (CO2) methods in a spatial context beyond the wellbore. This dynamic reservoir characterization could provide the industry with the ability to be more proactive than reactive in the management of reservoirs.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.