Abstract

This paper analyzes a dynamic Stackelberg differential game model of watershed transboundary water pollution abatement and discusses the optimal decision-making problem under non-cooperative and cooperative differential game, in which the accumulation effect and depreciation effect of learning-by-doing pollution abatement investment are taken into account. We use dynamic optimization theory to solve the equilibrium solution of models. Through numerical simulation analysis, the path simulation and analysis of the optimal trajectory curves of each variable under finite-planning horizon and long-term steady state were carried out. Under the finite-planning horizon, the longer the planning period is, the lower the optimal emission rate is in equilibrium. The long-term steady-state game under cooperative decision can effectively reduce the amount of pollution emission. The investment intensity of pollution abatement in the implementation of non-cooperative game is higher than that of cooperative game. Under the long-term steady state, the pollution abatement investment trajectory of the cooperative game is relatively stable and there is no obvious crowding out effect. Investment continues to rise, and the optimal equilibrium level at steady state is higher than that under non-cooperative decision making. The level of decline in pollution stock under finite-planning horizon is not significant. Under the condition of long-term steady state, the trajectories of upstream and downstream pollution in the non-cooperative model and cooperative model are similar, but cooperative decision-making model is superior to the non-cooperative model in terms of the period of stabilization and steady state.

Highlights

  • More and more experts and scholars use dynamic optimal control theory to study various complex pollution control problems. e differential game method based on dynamic optimal control theory provides an effective research tool for the treatment of transboundary pollution abatement

  • Breton et al [4] used a two-party finite-time differential game model to analyze the cooperative implementation of environmental projects. e key assumption of the model is that pollution abatement investments in one country can reduce the stock of pollution in other countries, and the cost of pollution

  • The optimal Nash equilibrium solution of instantaneous emission rate, investment intensity of pollution abatement, and the pollution stock in upstream and downstream regions under non-cooperative game and cooperative game are presented in Sections 3 and 4, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More and more experts and scholars use dynamic optimal control theory to study various complex pollution control problems. e differential game method based on dynamic optimal control theory provides an effective research tool for the treatment of transboundary pollution abatement. The optimal Nash equilibrium solution of instantaneous emission rate, investment intensity of pollution abatement, and the pollution stock in upstream and downstream regions under non-cooperative game and cooperative game are presented in Sections 3 and 4, respectively. Considering the decision making in continuous time, this constitutes a dynamic differential game relationship Under this model, both regions aim to maximize the net present value of their own long-term income. Substituting equations (32)–(34) into equation (8), collating, and solving, we obtain the optimal trajectory of pollution stock in the upstream and downstream regions under the non-cooperative game as follows: PN1 (t) 􏼠P10 −

Cooperative Game
Discussion
Further Analysis of the Optimal Pollution Abatement
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call