Abstract
Reduced postural control is thought to contribute to the development and persistence of chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). It is therefore frequently assessed in affected patients and commonly reported as the average amount of postural sway while standing upright under a variety of sensory conditions. These averaged linear outcomes, such as mean centre of pressure (CP) displacement or mean CP surface areas, may not reflect the true postural status. Adding nonlinear outcomes and multi-segmental kinematic analysis has been reported to better reflect the complexity of postural control and may detect subtler postural differences. In this cross-sectional study, a combination of linear and nonlinear postural parameters were assessed in patients with CNLBP (n = 24, 24-75 years, 9 females) and compared to symptom-free controls (CG, n = 34, 22-67 years, 11 females). Primary outcome was postural control measured by variance of joint configurations (uncontrolled manifold index, UI), confidence ellipse surface areas (CEA) and approximate entropy (ApEn) of CP dispersion during the response phase of a perturbed postural control task on a swaying platform. Secondary outcomes were segment excursions and clinical outcome correlates for pain and function. Non-parametric tests for group comparison with P-adjustment for multiple comparisons were conducted. Principal component analysis was applied to identify patterns of segmental contribution in both groups. CNLBP and CG performed similarly with respect to the primary outcomes. Comparison of joint kinematics revealed significant differences of hip (P < .001) and neck (P < .025) angular excursion, representing medium to large group effects (r′s = .36 − .51). Significant (P′s < .05), but moderate correlations of ApEn (r = -.42) and UI (r = -.46) with the health-related outcomes were observed. These findings lend further support to the notion that averaged linear outcomes do not suffice to describe subtle postural differences in CNLBP patients with low to moderate pain status.
Highlights
Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) is believed to develop in about 10% of people who experience some form of acute low back pain in their life-time [1]
Due to significant age difference between groups, a sub-group analysis with homogeneous age comparison was computed to confirm findings. Averaged values for both groups were statistically analysed using R 3.3.2 running on RStudio. Both groups performed with a UI greater than 0, which suggests the use of more motor equivalent joint configurations during the task in both groups than nonmotor equivalent configurations
Regarding the measure of magnitude, there was a tendency towards a greater confidence ellipse surface areas (CEA) in the CNLBP group (Mdn = 7.70cm2) than in the CG (Mdn = 5.75cm2), W = 280, z = −2.29, P = .04, r =
Summary
Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) is believed to develop in about 10% of people who experience some form of acute low back pain in their life-time [1]. As acute low back pain occurs in almost 84% of the population [2], CNLBP is a highly prevalent symptom causing troubling global socio-economic burdens through direct or indirect costs [2, 3]. Despite recent advances towards the understanding of the underlying mechanism, CNLBP remains a disabling condition limiting daily activities of affected people [5]. Evaluating possible causes and associated mechanisms of CNLBP has been, and remains, a priority in the field of musculoskeletal research [3]. There have been highly inconsistent findings regarding its validity [7, 8]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
