Abstract

Asymmetric investors’ sentiments on returns and risks play an important role in updating the portfolio strategies in multi-period portfolio selection problems. By introducing the Prospect Theory to measure the asymmetric investors’ sentiments, a dynamic sentiment-adjusted model (DSAM) is proposed to sparse portfolio selection problem over multiple periods, in which the objective is to minimize the risk of the portfolio. As we focus on the sparse portfolio, a l0 constraint is added to our model. The l0 constraint represents that we can only purchase at most k securities from N candidate securities, in which k is a small number compared to N. Since the objective function of the sparse portfolio with l0 constraint is NP-hard, and could not be solved by the Deep Learning algorithms. The stochastic neural networks algorithm with re-parametrisation trick (SNNrP) is introduced to solve the DSAM. The back-testing framework of our paper includes a multi-period portfolio selection model, in which asymmetric investors’ sentiments are modeled to iterate investors’ expected return level each period. In the back-testing framework, we conduct the experiments for different investment periods with different investors’ sentiments. The experimental results for the Nasdaq and CSI 300 data sets show that, on average, compared with the traditional Mean–variance model, the terminal return and risk obtained by the DSAM model outperforms by 9% and 11.75%.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.