Abstract

We study the impact of the optimal debt and priority structure on corporate financing and investment decisions in a dynamic trade-off model, where a firm simultaneously issues bank and market debt. Private bank debt is renegotiable during financial distress; thus it avoids inefficient and costly bankruptcy losses. Our model shows that the debt priority structure between bank and market debt has significant implications on ex post corporate policies, market leverage and firm valuation. Bank debt substitutes market debt in most cases except when firms face a low tax rate environment. Further, firms with stronger bargaining power, more valuable growth opportunities, or higher renegotiation frictions, facing lower cash flow risks, larger bankruptcy costs, or operating in a higher tax rate environment tend to rely more on market debt. We also demonstrate that the issuance of bank debt along with market debt mitigates the ex post debt overhang compared to the exclusive market debt structure, the effect of which is much stronger when the firm faces less renegotiation friction, lower bankruptcy costs, or higher corporate tax rate. These model predictions reconcile several empirical findings and generate a rich set of novel empirical tests.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.