Abstract

BackgroundIn recent years, the scientific discussion has focused on new strategies to enable a torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) to heal into mechanically stable scar tissue. Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) was first performed in a pilot study of 10 patients. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate whether DIS would lead to similarly sufficient stability and good clinical function in a larger case series.MethodsAcute ACL ruptures were treated by using an internal stabilizer, combined with anatomical repositioning of torn bundles and microfracturing to promote self-healing. Clinical assessment (Tegner, Lysholm, IKDC, and visual analogue scale [VAS] for patient satisfaction scores) and assessment of knee laxity was performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. A one-sample design with a non-inferiority margin was chosen to compare the preoperative and postoperative IKDS and Lysholm scores.Results278 patients with a 6:4 male to female ratio were included. Average patient age was 31 years. Preoperative mean IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores were 98.8, 99.3, and 5.1 points, respectively. The mean anteroposterior (AP) translation difference from the healthy contralateral knee was 4.7 mm preoperatively. After DIS treatment, the mean 12-month IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores were 93.6, 96.2, and 4.9 points, respectively, and the mean AP translation difference was 2.3 mm. All these outcomes were significantly non-inferior to the preoperative or healthy contralateral values (p < 0.0001). Mean patient satisfaction was 8.8 (VAS 0–10). Eight ACL reruptures occurred and 3 patients reported insufficient subjective stability of the knee at the end of the study period.ConclusionsAnatomical repositioning, along with DIS and microfracturing, leads to clinically stable healing of the torn ACL in the large majority of patients. Most patients exhibited almost normal knee function, reported excellent satisfaction, and were able to return to their previous levels of sporting activity. Moreover, this strategy resulted in stable healing of all sutured menisci, which could lower the rate of osteoarthritic changes in future. The present findings support the discussion of a new paradigm in ACL treatment based on preservation and self-healing of the torn ligament.

Highlights

  • In recent years, the scientific discussion has focused on new strategies to enable a torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) to heal into mechanically stable scar tissue

  • Barrack et al described a significant loss of knee proprioception with impaired muscular stabilization after ACL rupture [7], and Jerosch et al showed no significantly better proprioception after ACL transplant compared with the preoperative group [8]

  • After extensive microfracturing at the femoral footprint, the knee is stabilized with a strong polyethylene cord, which is passed on the tibial side behind the tibial footprint, preventing the tibial blood and nerve supply from additional damage, and on the femoral side through the anatomical footprint

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The scientific discussion has focused on new strategies to enable a torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) to heal into mechanically stable scar tissue. A conservative treatment approach shows satisfactory results in patients who place low demands on the knee joint [1,2,3], but the failure rate remains high in a physically active population [2,3]. Current techniques of ACL reconstruction have demonstrated biomechanical, three-dimensional reestablishment of knee joint stability, enabling patients to perform pivoting sports, but compared with conservative treatment decreased degeneration of the knee joint could not be demonstrated [6]. Barrack et al described a significant loss of knee proprioception with impaired muscular stabilization after ACL rupture [7], and Jerosch et al showed no significantly better proprioception after ACL transplant compared with the preoperative group [8]. Loss of the ACL’s “proprioceptive envelope” could be one explanation for the high incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis after ACL injuries, which cannot be overcome by an ACL transplant

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call