Abstract

Hash tables are one of the most fundamental data structures in computer science, in both theory and practice. They are especially useful in external memory, where their query performance approaches the ideal cost of just one disk access. Knuth [16] gave an elegant analysis showing that with some simple collision resolution strategies such as linear probing or chaining, the expected average number of disk I/Os of a lookup is merely 1+1/2Ω(b), where each I/O can read and/or write a disk block containing b items. Inserting a new item into the hash table also costs 1+1/2Ω(b) I/Os, which is again almost the best one can do if the hash table is entirely stored on disk. However, this requirement is unrealistic since any algorithm operating on an external hash table must have some internal memory (at least Ω(1) blocks) to work with. The availability of a small internal memory buffer can dramatically reduce the amortized insertion cost to o(1) I/Os for many external memory data structures. In this paper we study the inherent query-insertion tradeoff of external hash tables in the presence of a memory buffer. In particular, we show that for any constant c>1, if the expected average successful query cost is targeted at 1+O(1/bc) I/Os, then it is not possible to support insertions in less than 1-O(1/bc-1/6) I/Os amortized, which means that the memory buffer is essentially useless. While if the query cost is relaxed to 1+O(1/bc) I/Os for any constant c

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.