Abstract

This paper analyzes an ongoing bargaining situation in which preferences evolve over time and the previous agreement becomes the next status quo, determining the payoffs until a new agreement is reached. We show that the endogeneity of the status quo induces perverse incentives that exacerbate the players' conflict of interest: Players disagree more often than they would if the status quo was exogenous. This leads to inefficiencies and status quo inertia. Under certain conditions, the endogenous status quo leads the negotiations to a complete gridlock in which players never reach an agreement. Such gridlock can occur between players with arbitrarily similar preferences, provided they are sufficiently patient. When applied to the legislative setting, our model predicts polarized behavior, and explains why oftentimes legislators fail to react in a timely fashion to economic shocks.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.