Abstract

The memory industry has twice experienced a change of market leadership, from the US to Japan in the early 1980s and from Japan to Korea in the 1990s. More than two decades have now passed, however, without further leadership change. This paper examines the reasons for this and discusses its implications for catch-up strategies and changing windows of opportunity for latecomers. It identifies the catch-up strategy that is imperative in the memory industry as a “dynamic catch-up strategy” and investigates how it worked for Japan and Korea until the middle of the 1990s. It then explores why the strategy later became more difficult to implement successfully.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.