Abstract

The postharvest fragrance quality of aromatic cut flowers is crucial, yet efficient and rapid detection methods are lacking. To develop a rapid and accurate method for evaluating the fragrance quality during the senescence of aromatic cut flowers, this study first utilized HS–SPME–GC–MS to analyze the fragrance of six Hedychium cultivars cut flowers at different stages postharvest (bud, semi-open, full bloom, and senescence), identifying 69 compounds. Multivariate statistical analysis revealed significant during full bloom, with monoterpenoids predominant in ‘ZS’, ‘EM’, ‘Gaoling’, and ‘Jin’, and benzenoids/phenylpropanoids in ‘MH’. Concurrently, PTR–ToF–MS detected 68 masses consistent with GC–MS results. PLS–DA analysis identified eucalyptol, benzyl acetate, linalool, (E)-β-ocimene, methyl benzoate, and masses m/z 91.057, m/z 137.134, m/z 81.07, m/z 102.096, m/z 31.019 as potential markers for distinguishing Hedychium varieties. Additionally, PLS analysis identified masses m/z 58.078, m/z 103.076, and m/z 155.144 as predictors of agarospirol content; m/z 73.065, m/z 74.069, m/z 151.151 for eucalyptol, and m/z 27.021, m/z 31.019, m/z 41.039, m/z 43.054, m/z 55.054, m/z 57.033, m/z 70.077, m/z 72.056, m/z 88.079, m/z 91.057, m/z 92.065, and m/z 108.089 for benzyl acetate. The results provide new methods for efficient fragrance evaluation during the postharvest senescence of aromatic flower.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.