Abstract

This paper addresses the question to which extent the prevailing modelling practice of ignoring foreign asset cross-ownership patterns in applied general equilibrium trade policy studies may give rise to distorted predictions. The analytic framework is a stylized dynamic two-country model with international capital mobility and intertemporally optimizing agents. In principle even the sign of the predicted welfare effect of a trade policy shock might reverse, when the actual cross-ownership structure underlying a given net foreign asset position is taken into account. However, the analysis also indicates conditions under which the error incurred by disregarding asset crossholdings remains negligible.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.