Abstract
The purpose of the presented paper is the presentation and critical assesment of the two arguments for the principle of self-ownership raised by the founding father of libertarianism – an economist and political philosopher Murray Newton Rothbard (1926-1995). As author points out, both arguments are rooted in the theory of natural law and natural rights. He argues that this theory, in addition to being untenable per se, is incompatbile with the ethics of libertarianism and therefore every libertarian argument set on its stone must inevitably fail. However, according to the author, Rothbard’s second argument – that is, the argumentum a contrario, is logically indipendent of the natural law theory and, thus, can be defended on different philosophical grounds, although Rothbard himself derived it from the erroneous natural law premises.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.