Duty-based theories: pros and cons

Abstract

Journal of Kidney CareVol. 5, No. 3 EthicsDuty-based theories: pros and consPeter EllisPeter EllisEmail: E-mail Address: [email protected]Registered manager, Whitepost Healthcare and Independent Nursing and Educational Consultant, KentSearch for more papers by this authorPeter EllisPublished Online:2 Jun 2020https://doi.org/10.12968/jokc.2020.5.3.126AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References Beauchamp T, Childress, J. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012 Google ScholarEllis P. Ethical concepts: the meaning of consequentialism. Journal of Kidney Care. 2019; 4(5):274–276. https://doi.org/10.12968/jokc.2019.4.5.274 Link, Google ScholarEllis P. Ethical concepts: consequentialism: pros and cons. Journal of Kidney Care. 2019a; 4(6):322–324. https://doi.org/10.12968/jokc.2019.4.6.322 Link, Google ScholarEllis P. Ethical concepts: duty-based theories. Journal of Kidney Care. 2020; 5(1):30–32. https://doi.org/10.12968/jokc.2020.5.1.30 Link, Google ScholarNursing and Midwifery Council. The code: professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates. 2018. https://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/code (accessed 22 April 2020) Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byEthical concepts and duty-based theories: scopePeter Ellis29 July 2020 | Journal of Kidney Care, Vol. 5, No. 4 2 May 2020Volume 5Issue 3ISSN (print): 2397-9534ISSN (online): 2397-9542 Metrics History Published online 2 June 2020 Published in print 2 May 2020 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedKeywordsbiomedical ethicsduty-based theorieskidney carePDF download