Abstract
Abstract In order to succeed in a negligence action, the claimant must establish that he or she was owed a ‘duty of care’ by the defendant. The following chapter examines the tests the courts apply to determine whether a duty is owed. It also considers the impact of jurisprudence of the European Court on Human Rights on imposition of a duty, and the particular difficulties imposing a duty in cases of pure economic losses, psychiatric harm and omissions. Not all aspects of duty of care are considered in this chapter. We examine whether imposition of a duty is fair, just, and reasonable in Chapter 4 and the related issue of justiciability in Chapter 2.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
