Dutch Sexologist perceptions on monitoring nocturnal erectile function

Abstract

Background: There has been a long-standing interest in assessing male sexual function over the past number of decades. Erectile Dysfunction (ED) is commonly classified as organic, psychogenic, or mixed. Aim: The principal aim of this questionnaire was to determine the ways in which Dutch healthcare professionals (sexologists) define the type of ED in their daily practice. The second aim was to evaluate sexologists’ opinions regarding their experiences with the Rigiscan and the desired aspects of a yet-to-be-developed successor. Methods: We performed an anonymous survey study. A questionnaire with 21 items was mailed to all participants of the Dutch Association of Sexology. To obtain a higher response rate the survey was sent three times. The questionnaire was designed by two Dutch sexologists from the Sint Antonius Hospital. The survey questions were pre-tested, and after making changes to the questionnaire it was pilot tested. Outcomes: Eighty-eight people responded and sixty-six respondents completed the survey. Results: The majority of respondents reported that information obtained by a thorough sexual history, according to the biopsychosocial model, is sufficient to diagnose the cause of ED and enable them to provide the correct therapy. For additional diagnostics, respondents indicate to refer to a urologist for physical examination, basic laboratory tests, or, if necessary, advanced examinations such as a nocturnal penile tumescence measurement. 83% of respondents said to use a simple sensor to differentiate the cause of ED if this would be available. Features respondents mentioned of a future sensor where: validated, patient-friendly, and easy to use at home. Clinical implications: The data provide information to develop a new sensor to measure nocturnal erections. Strengths & limitations: Study strengths include: The first report among Dutch sexologists about usage and needs for nocturnal erections measurements. Study limitations include a non-validated questionnaire. A diverse group of Dutch sexologists, not many medical sexologists. Low response rate. Conclusion: The participating sexologists indicate a need for more clarity regarding the different tools which could be useful for the differentiation between primary organic and primary psychogenic ED. A new validated, patient-friendly sensor that can be used by patients in their home setting was appointed to be helpful.