Abstract

The voicing contrast is neutralized syllable and word finally in Dutch and German, leading to alternations within the morphological paradigm (e.g., Dutch 'bed(s)', be[t]-be[d]en, German 'dog(s)', Hun[t]-Hun[d]e). Despite structural similarity, language-specific morphological, phonological and lexical properties impact on the distribution of this alternation in the two languages. Previous acquisition research has focused on one language only, predominantly focusing on children's production accuracy, concluding that alternations are not acquired until late in the acquisition process in either language. This paper adapts a perceptual method to investigate how voicing alternations are represented in the mental lexicon of Dutch and German 3-year-olds. Sensitivity to mispronunciations of voicing word-medially in plural forms was measured using a visual fixation procedure. Dutch children exhibited evidence of overgeneralizing the voicing alternation, whereas German children consistently preferred the correct pronunciation to mispronunciations. Results indicate that the acquisition of voicing alternations is influenced by language-specific factors beyond the alternation itself.

Highlights

  • This paper uses a perception-based task to investigate how morphophonological alternations are represented in the toddler’s mental lexicon

  • Morphophonological alternations are changes in the surface phonetic form of the stem or affix that arise due to the application of inflectional morphology, ensuring the surface form adheres to language-specific phonotactic patterns

  • This paper focuses on the voicing alternation in Dutch and German that occurs due to final devoicing (e.g., Dutch ‘bed(s)’ [bɛt]~[bɛdən])

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper uses a perception-based task to investigate how morphophonological alternations are represented in the toddler’s mental lexicon. Morphophonological alternations are changes in the surface phonetic form of the stem or affix that arise due to the application of inflectional morphology, ensuring the surface form adheres to language-specific phonotactic patterns. /d/ Dach [dax] ‘roof’ Feder [kɛtɪŋ] [lɑdər] [bɔʏtl] [fedɐ]. Final pet bed Brot Hund [pɛt] [bɛt] [brot] [hʊnt]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.