Abstract

The concentration and the composition of dust in the indoor environment has been associated with reported symptoms of the sick building syndrome. Levels of airborne concentrations of dust particles are well known. However, the relation to dust on surfaces for office environments are not well described. In this study, 662 measurements were performed of surface dust concentrations on hard surfaces in 19 buildings within Harvard University based on a sticking gelatine foil method. The measure is the dust covered area of the surface as a percentage. In three offices, the build-up of dust on surfaces was measured for a period of five days. Close to these surfaces the airborne PM 2.5 and PM 10 particle mass concentrations were measured simultanously. A significant correlation between the dust build-up and the difference between the PM 10 and the PM 2.5 was established. The particle size distribution was measured by means of an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer. The mean dust build-up normalized with the measured PM 10 was approximately four times higher than the equivalent calculated by a deposition model. This may in part be due to the effect of preferred orientation when particles settle to a surface. Different data for dust on surfaces and airborne particles in offices were compared. The levels of airborne particles in offices in Europe seem to be higher than the levels in the US.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call