Abstract

In general, routine industrial hygiene (IH) data are collected not to serve for scientific research but to check for compliance with occupational limit values. In the preparation of an occupational retrospective cohort study it is vital to test the validity of the exposure assessment based on incomplete (temporal coverage, departments) IH data. Existing IH data from a large hard metal plant was collected. Individual workers’ exposure per year and department was estimated based on linear regression of log-transformed exposure data for dust, tungsten, and cobalt. Estimated data were back-transformed, and for cobalt the validity of the estimates was confirmed by comparison with individual cobalt concentrations in urine. Air monitoring data were available from 1985 to 2012 and urine tests from the years 2008 to 2014. A declining trend and significant differences among departments was evident for all three air pollutants. The estimated time trend fitted the time trend in urine values well. At 1 mg/m3, cobalt in the air leads to an excretion of approximately 200 µg/L cobalt in urine. Cobalt levels in urine were significantly higher in smokers with an interaction effect between smoking and air concentrations. Exposure estimates of individual workers are generally feasible in the examined plant, although some departments are not documented sufficiently enough. Additional information (expert knowledge) is needed to fill these gaps.

Highlights

  • Cobalt (Co) is an essential element with ubiquitous dietary exposure

  • The industrial hygiene data of measurements of dust, tungsten, and cobalt were collected, and, in addition, biomonitoring data of cobalt in urine from exposed workers was obtained from the occupational health department

  • In the final panel models (Table 3) there remained a significant negative time trend and the analyses indicated a relevant part of the variance to be between panels (25% for job class and 49% for individual workers)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cobalt (Co) is an essential element with ubiquitous dietary exposure. Further significant possible exposures are through occupation and medical devices. Focus of adverse health effects is the carcinogenic potential of Co (lung cancer). The metal and its compounds have been classified as carcinogenic since the 1970s, with a general International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [1]. Assessment of cobalt in 1991 (group 2B). In its Monograph 86, IARC [2] rated cobalt metal with tungsten carbide as being probably carcinogenic to humans (group 2A). French [3,4,5] and Swedish [6]

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.