Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and long-term outcomes following drug-eluting balloon or drug-eluting stents for treatment of in-stent restenosis (DAPT-Dragon Registry)

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The aim of the DAPT-DRAGON registry was to asses long-term outcomes and the length of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to drug-eluting stent in stent restenosis (DES-ISR) with drug-eluting balloons (DEB) or thin-DES. Background Data regarding the duration of DAPT in patients with DES-ISR treated with PCI is still undergoing research and observation, and the adequate duration of DAPT in this group of patients is not unambiguously sanctioned. Methods Overall, 1,367 consecutive patients with DES-ISR who underwent PCI with DEB or DES, were entered into the multi-center DAPT-DRAGON Registry (Fig. 1). The mean age was 66.7±9 years (70.5% males). The median follow-up was 3.3 years. There were 34.1% patients with chronic coronary syndrome, 35.2% with unstable angina, 2.9% with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and 27.7% with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI). We assessed selected study endpoints according to the duration of DAPT (≤3 vs. >3 months and ≤6 vs. >6 months), before and after propensity score matching (PSM): stroke, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), MI, death and device-oriented composite endpoints (DOCE). Results Among predictors of increased DOCE rate before PSM, we demonstrated: PCI with DEB vs. DES (p<0.001), recurrent ISR (p=0.002), treatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor during PCI (p<0.001), lower left ventricle ejection fraction (p=0.004) and extent of stenosis (p<0.001). Pairwise contrast analysis considering type of PCI (thin-DES vs. DEB) and duration of DAPT (≤6 vs. >6 months) before PSM revealed superiority of thin-DES+DAPT >6 months vs. DEB+DAPT >6 months for DOCE (p<0.001), TVR (p=0.02) and TLR (p=0.01). After PSM analysis, the length of DAPT (≤3 vs. >3 months) had no significant influence on assessed long-term outcomes, while the percentage of stroke free survival was significantly lower in the group of patients with DAPT ≤6 months vs. >6 months (p=0.01; Fig. 2). Conclusions Long-term treatment with DAPT (>6 months) in patients with DES-ISR with DES implantation is related to better long-term outcomes in terms of lower rate of DOCE, TVR and TLR compared to PCI with DEB. DAPT >6 months is related to a greater rate of strokes, independently of the type of treatment (thin-DES and DEB) compared to DAPT ≤6 months. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1Figure 2