Abstract

BackgroundThe relationship between duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and post-arrest outcomes based on severity stratification in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) remains unclear. MethodsWe analysed 420,959 adult patients without prehospital ROSC in the All-Japan OHCA registry for 4 years. Prehospital CPR duration was defined as the time from CPR initiation by emergency medical service (EMS) providers to hospital arrival. The primary outcome was 1-month neurologically intact survival (cerebral performance category 1 or 2, CPC 1–2). ResultsThe rate of overall 1-month CPC 1–2 was 0.45% (1899/420,959). Using recursive partitioning analysis to predict 1-month CPC 1–2, we stratified patients into 4 groups with 3 predictors: patients aged <75 years with initial shockable rhythm (1-month CPC 1–2 rate, 6.15%), those aged ≥75 years with initial shockable rhythm (1.32%), those with EMS-witnessed arrest and initial non-shockable rhythm (1.62%), and those with EMS-unwitnessed arrest and initial non-shockable rhythm (0.15%). Prehospital CPR duration was negatively associated with 1-month CPC 1–2 (adjusted odds ratio 0.94 per 1-min increment; 95% confidence interval 0.94–0.95). Prehospital CPR durations beyond which the dynamic probability of 1-month CPC 1–2 decreased to <1% were 26 min, 10 min, 7 min, and at all times in above-mentioned stratification, respectively. ConclusionsIn OHCA patients without prehospital ROSC, those aged <75 years with initial shockable rhythm had acceptable 1-month CPC 1–2 rate. However, CPR efforts lasting 26 min or over before hospital arrival could be futile.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.