Duration of acute esophageal toxicity in concomitant radio-chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with different fractionation schedules.

Abstract

In our previous prospective trial on accelerated hypofractionated concomitant radiochemotherapy (AHRT-CHT) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the incidence of grade ≥3 acute esophageal toxicity (AET) was similar to that reported for conventionally fractionated concomitant radiochemotherapy (CFRT-CHT), but its duration was prolonged. Thus, we aimed to compare the duration of grade ≥3 AET between AHRT-CHT and CFRT-CHT. Clinical data of 76 NSCLC patients treated with CFRT-CHT (60-66 Gy/2 Gy) during 2015-2020 were retrospectively compared with the data of 92 patients treated with AHRT-CHT (58.8 Gy/2.8 Gy) in the prospective trial. The maximum grade of AET, incidence, and duration of grade ≥3 AET were the end points. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to correlate clinical and treatment variables with these end points. Neither the maximum grade of AET (p = 0.71), nor the incidence of grade ≥3 AET (p = 0.87) differed between the two groups. The number of CHT cycles delivered (2 vs 1, p = 0.005) and higher esophagus mean BED (p = 0.009) were significant predictors for a higher maximum grade of AET; older age was a significant predictor for higher incidence of grade ≥3 AET (p = 0.03). The median duration of grade ≥3 AET in AHRT-CHT and CFRT-CHT group was 30 days (range 5-150) vs 7 days (range 3-20), respectively, p = 0.0005. In multivariate analysis, only the AHRT-CHT schedule (p=0.003) was a significant predictor for a longer duration of grade ≥3 AET. Despite similar incidence of grade ≥3 AET, its duration is significantly prolonged in NSCLC patients treated with AHRT-CHT compared to CFRT-CHT. Reporting only the rate of grade ≥3 AET in clinical trials may underestimate the real extent of the esophageal toxicity; its duration should also be routinely reported.