Abstract

BackgroundDiabetes is a common condition that often requires increasing intensity of glucose lowering regimens. We describe the population trends in the intensity of regimens, and associations of achieved HbA1c and treatment persistence. MethodsWe performed an episode-based analysis of the EXTEND-45 dataset, assessing trends in glucose lowering therapy and the associated outcomes of HbA1c and treatment persistence. Trends from 2009 to 2014 were assessed for each intensity level of a glucose lowering therapy regimen, according to the year prescribed. Episodes were defined as the length of time that an individual adhered to a regimen through ongoing prescription, and this was used as to define persistence. Mean HbA1c were calculated for each episode. Persistence and HbA1c were compared across the different regimens of treatment intensity. ResultsThe intensity of glucose lowering therapy remained stable over time with around one third of episodes utilising a single glucose lowering agent. Mean HbA1c was higher for insulin-based treatment (mean 7.9 % SD = 1.3 %), and lowest for episodes of no glucose lowering treatment (mean 6.3 % (SD = 0.8 %). Around half of participants achieved glycemic targets of 7 %. While there was considerable variation in persistence, the median persistence was around 3 months (94 days, IQR 51–201 days). ConclusionsTherapeutic intensity for diabetes has remained stable over 9 years. Whilst there was considerable variability in persistence with glucose lowering regimens, the mean duration of all regimens was less than a year. Requirement for higher intensity treatment with insulin was related to poorer glycemic control.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.